Wes Anderson’s movie brings Roald Dahl’s short story to life with his signature visual style and whimsical storytelling. While remaining surprisingly faithful to the plot and dialogue of the original, the film takes creative liberties that offer a distinct cinematic experience.

Both film and story follow Henry Sugar, a wealthy yet bored man, as he becomes obsessed with learning card counting to win at roulette. The core narrative of his transformation, driven by greed and ultimately leading to reflection, remains largely intact. Anderson even retains much of Dahl’s witty dialogue, creating a sense of familiarity for fans of the author.

However, the film expands on the source material through its visual storytelling. Anderson meticulously crafts a world bursting with vibrant colors, symmetrical sets, and quirky characters, further emphasizing the absurdity of Sugar’s quest. Scenes not present in the story, like Sugar’s interactions with his dog-walking assistant, add humor and depth to his character.

One key difference lies in the portrayal of Sugar’s motivations. The story delves deeper into his internal struggles and moral conflicts, leaving room for reader interpretation. The film, while retaining some introspection, primarily focuses on the external events of his journey, relying on visuals and comedic situations to convey his transformation.

Anderson’s theatrical presentation also sets the film apart. The use of direct address, narration by Ralph Fiennes as Roald Dahl himself, and stage-like set design adds a playful touch, distancing the film from the more grounded realism of the story.